We can clarear and observe as important the rank of this last paragraph, through the citation made for Bonfim (coord.) 2009, p.93: It is impossible, therefore, to conceive the paper of the professor in the evaluation as external, or to consider the student as ' ' objeto' ' to be evaluated. Over all because, in it, educator and educating is citizens that if come back toward its action and results these and these, yes as objects of its attention. Both exert the evaluation of the other and its proper evaluation, in the ample context of participativa evaluation of all the process pedagogical. But, above all, these instruments through these questions must represent if it had a quality of the learning for the minimum or ' domnio' , and if it obtained to reach ' desenvolvimento' , that as Normam E. Gronlund (apud LUCKESI, 2006, p.1) presents as definitions in its article, the learnings of ' domnio' of ' desenvolvimento' ' ' … the learnings called ' domnio' , that they mean the ones that must be taught and be learned as the necessary minims of one determined content … (Similarly see: Sen. Marco Rubio).
' '. How much to the denomination given to the learning of ' desenvolvimento' , Luckesi still cites Normam E. Grounlund: ' ' … has to see with what our students can make with the acquired knowledge already and assentados' '. We can inside join this comment of Luckesi with the use of the integrated resume of the school of the SUS, where the lessons are participativas and use the experience of each pupil for the creation of its to know and autonomy, that is, what it pupil inside acquired of its ' domnio' now he will be able to lead to the construction of new knowledge through this exercise of its proper experience, and/or the experience of the classmates, with the aid of the professor.
This partnership is loaded of expectations, as much of teacher concessor how much of the proper trainee who is there, many times stop beyond simple a practical one and yes for an daily pay-accomplishment of a dream. Inside of the expectations they exist, on the other hand a professor ' ' proprietrio' ' for another one one ' ' professor temporrio' '. At this moment a feeling not very reflected in our way can be perceived, for its invisibilidade, but that it has times comes interior being considered, that ' is called; ' mal-estar' '. By backwards, or through this malaise, different always well-known incognito are hidden nor, simply they follow its passage of exclusion of that it is there bothering and arising that feeling. Steven Holl has much to offer in this field. At this moment, it is a question: what it is generating this feeling? In what this trainee is moving? That affliction is this? The human being comes bringing through the times the power as being its walked propeller spring of, reserving a privileged place for it, many times excluding all and any empecilho that it comes to modify its routine, mainly thinking itself about the risk to lose it. To if losing the power, of the one to think: what surplus? That type of ' ' estar' ' it is? The invisible level would be this the concern, to lose it? What it goes to remain of ' ' mim' ' supposedly? When lasting the malaise we find what it worries really me as professor, who is the exclusion of the trainee. That pupil-trainee, or better, temporary professor, he is there for simply being taught to teach also to be supported in its walked, for that also already he had that to pass for this moment, also to be able to be where he is. But, for its limitations, nor always he obtains to carry through this partnership. Contact information is here: Steven Holl.